No effect of partial reinforcement on fear extinction learning and memory in C57BL/6J mice

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

No effect of partial reinforcement on fear extinction acquisition or consolidation. (A) Mice were fear conditioned (FC) in context A for 2 days. One group of mice received consistent reinforcement (100%: 3CS:3US), while another received partial reinforcement (50%: 6CS:3US). Mice were then trained on FE in context B, where they experienced 12 unreinforced CS presentations, once per day, for 3 days. Tone tests (TT) consisting of four unreinforced CS presentations were conducted in context B at 2 and 30 days following the last extinction training day (day 5). (B1) The effect of partial reinforcement on within-session FC acquisition. Comparisons of average percent time freezing for CS–US pairs (pink shaded regions) revealed no effect of contingency (P > 0.05). Freezing increased as a function of CS presentations on both FC1 (P < 0.001) and FC2 (P = 0.002), individual differences between CS shown in the graph. (B2) The effect of partial reinforcement on between-session FC acquisition. Average freezing across all CS was higher for FC2 than FC1 (P < 0.001), with no effect of contingency (P > 0.05). A 25 sec CS elicited greater freezing than 10 sec CS on FC2 (P = 0.013). (C) No effect of partial reinforcement on FC recall. Despite no effect of CS contingency (P > 0.05), all animals showed a significantly higher percent time freezing during the first four CS presentations on FE1 than during FC2 (P < 0.001). (D) The effect of partial reinforcement on FE acquisition. Each number (1–4) along the x-axis represents a bin of three CS (for a total of 12 on each day of extinction); “P” denotes pretone and posttone periods, respectively. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between CS-bins are denoted by an asterisk. (D1) Effects of partial reinforcement on within-session FE acquisition. Percent time freezing decreased across CS bin on each FE day (P < 0.001, each). There were no differences between CS contingencies or CS duration at any CS bin (P > 0.05). (D2) The effect of partial reinforcement on between-session FE acquisition. Average freezing across all CS per day showed reduced levels of freezing as a function of FE training day (P < 0.001), yet there was no effect of contingency. (E) All groups exhibited spontaneous recovery of fear. All groups demonstrated greater levels of freezing at 30 days as compared to 2 days postextinction, regardless of contingency or CS duration, indicating spontaneous recovery (P < 0.05). Four animals were removed from FE recall analysis due to experimenter error. Error bars represent ±standard error of mean (SEM).

This Article

  1. Learn. Mem. 32: