Remembering what we imagine: the role of event schemas in shaping how imagined autobiographical events are recalled

Table 3.

The results of the LMMs with the number of internal and external detail additions as the dependent variables

Predictors Estimates SE CI Statistic df P
Internal additions
 (Intercept) 5.52 0.40 4.73–6.31 13.68 70.10 <0.001
 Event expectancy 0.25 0.38 −0.50–1.00 0.65 320.82 0.51
 Context familiarity 0.29 0.38 −0.45–1.03 0.76 321.18 0.44
 Word count (Session 2) 2.48 0.40 1.71–3.26 6.27 290.34 <0.001
 Event expectancy × context familiarity −1.30 0.54 −2.36 to −0.24 −2.41 320.46 0.02
External additions
 (Intercept) 0.87 0.17 0.54–1.19 5.20 74.34 <0.001
 Event expectancy −0.02 0.17 −0.35–0.32 −0.10 317.62 0.92
 Context familiarity 0.22 0.17 −0.11–0.55 1.31 318.06 0.19
 Word count (Session 2) 0.40 0.17 0.06–0.74 2.33 245.23 0.02
 Event expectancy × context familiarity −0.27 0.24 −0.75–0.20 −1.12 317.14 0.26
  • Bolded values are significant at α < 0.05. Covariates for participants’ verbosity (Word Count Session 2) were centered and scaled by 2 SDs before model fitting.

This Article

  1. Learn. Mem. 31: