Table 3.
Results of mixed-effects logistic regression for predicting the likelihood of correctly recognizing an item image (hit)
| Dependent variable: correctly recognizing an old item image (hit) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
| Odds ratio | CI | P | Odds ratios | CI | P | |
| Fixed effects | ||||||
| Intercept | 6.26 | 4.24–9.25 | <0.001 | 7.03 | 4.27–11.58 | <0.001 |
| Valence: neutral | 0.95 | 0.76–1.18 | 0.623 | 0.89 | 0.68–1.17 | 0.406 |
| Valence: positive | 0.95 | 0.76–1.17 | 0.612 | 0.92 | 0.73–1.16 | 0.476 |
| Negative affect: high | 0.58 | 0.34–0.97 | 0.038 | 0.58 | 0.34–0.97 | 0.038 |
| Rated arousal | 0.97 | 0.89–1.05 | 0.465 | |||
| Random effects | ||||||
| σ2 | 3.29 | 3.29 | ||||
| n | 59 | 59 | ||||
-
Model 1 included predictors context valence and negative affect group. Model 2 additionally included predictor-rated arousal. The models did not significantly differ from each other. Bold indicates statistical significance of predictors (for a better overview).
