Awareness and differential eyeblink conditioning: effects of manipulating auditory CS frequencies

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

% CRs broken down by group and awareness. (A,B) Both aware and unaware Group I participants showed greater % CRs to CS+ relative to CS− when CSs were distinct (1000 Hz vs. white noise). (C,D) Significantly greater % CRs to CS+ relative to CS− was observed early (Blocks 1 and 2) for aware participants and later (Blocks 3 and 5) for unaware participants when CSs were similar (1000 Hz vs. 1400 Hz). (E,F) No significant differences were detected when CSs were very similar (1000 Hz vs. 1150 Hz). (*) P < 0.05.

This Article

  1. Learn. Mem. 27: 78-82