Awareness and differential eyeblink conditioning: effects of manipulating auditory CS frequencies

  1. Dominic T. Cheng1
  1. 1Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA
  2. 2Department of Physiology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
  1. Corresponding author: dcheng{at}auburn.edu

Abstract

The role of awareness in differential delay eyeblink conditioning (EBC) has been a topic of much debate. We tested the idea that awareness is required for differential delay EBC when two cues are perceptually similar. The present study manipulated frequencies of auditory conditioned stimuli (CS) to vary CS similarity in three groups of participants. Our findings indicate that awareness was not necessary for differential delay EBC when two tones are easily discriminable, awareness was also not needed for relatively similar tones but may facilitate earlier conditioning, and awareness alone was not sufficient for differential delay EBC.

Footnotes

  • Received June 13, 2019.
  • Accepted November 22, 2019.

This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

| Table of Contents