Sensory preconditioning in newborn rabbits: from common to distinct odor memories

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Odor memories created by sensory preconditioning using two pairs of odorants. (A) Case of two overlapping odor pairs. Pups were exposed to odorants A+B then B+C on day 1 (d1), before MP-induced conditioning to A on day 2, and recall of B on day 3 followed by injection of saline. Pups responded to A, B, and C on day 4, indicating sensory preconditioned responses to odorant B and to odorant C. (B) Case of two nonoverlapping odor pairs. Pups were exposed to odorants A+B then C+D, before MP-conditioning to A, and recall of A followed by injection of saline. Pups responded to A and B but not to C and D, indicating that the sensory preconditioned response is selective. (C,D) Pups were exposed to odorants A+B then B+C on day 1, and conditioned to odorant A by pairing with the MP on day 2. On day 3, they were reexposed to odorant B (C) or A (D) and injected with anisomycin (AN). Only the response to the reactivated odorant was impaired on day 4, indicating the rapid independence of the A, B, and C memories after the conditioning. (E) Pups were exposed to odorants A+B and B+C on day 1, reexposed to odorant B and injected with AN on day 2, and MP-conditioned to odorant A on day 3. Pups responded to A but not to B and C on day 4, confirming that an A–B–C chain exists, but only before the conditioning to A. (**) P < 0.01, (*) P < 0.05.

This Article

  1. Learn. Mem. 20: 453-458