The selectivity of aversive memory reconsolidation and extinction processes depends on the initial encoding of the Pavlovian association

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Extinction of one of the components of the compound stimulus induces the concomitant extinction of the other component. (A) Rats trained using a compound stimulus conditioning protocol and subjected 1 d later to 28 repeated presentations of the light component of the compound (extinction procedure) show decreased freezing to the tone during LTM test. Top panel: chart showing the experimental design. Left graph: freezing average (mean ± SEM) across the first (Early) three and the last (Late) three light presentations during extinction. Right graph: mean ± SEM freezing in response to the tone and the light averaged across stimuli presentations during LTM. (B) If light and tone were not presented as a compound during training but were paired individually with the US, the extinction of the light does not induce the extinction of the tone. Top panel: chart presenting the experimental design. Left graph: freezing average (mean ± SEM) across the first three and the last three (out of 28) light presentations during extinction. Right graph: mean ± SEM freezing in response to the tone and the light averaged across stimuli presentations during LTM. (T) Tone, (L) light, (US) unconditioned stimulus, (LTM) long-term memory, (#) P < 0.05 vs. Early extinction, (*) P < 0.05 vs. Tone.

This Article

  1. Learn. Mem. 20: 695-699