Chronic stress enhances threat responding and impacts fear extinction

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Chronic unpredictable stress does not affect fear acquisition. (A) Experimental time line of the fear conditioning paradigm. Mice (N = 32) were randomly assigned to either 4 weeks of chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) or nonstress (CTL) groups. After 4 weeks of CUS protocol, all mice underwent fear conditioning followed by 2 days of extinction protocols. N = 16 mice underwent surgeries prior to the behavioral paradigms to retrogradely label projection-specific neurons (either BNST or NAc) in the BLA. Mice were sacrificed 90 min after the final extinction session for subsequent analyses. (B) Average percent freezing (±SEM) during tone presentations on the fear acquisition day. Freezing increased with repeated tone-shock presentations but was not impacted by previous CUS exposure (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: tones: F(2.745,82.34) = 123.7, P < 0.0001; stress: F(1,30) = 0.8169, P = 0.3733; tone × stress: F(2.745,82.34) = 0.8553, P = 0.4593). (C) Average freezing during habituation was not impacted by CUS (Mann–Whitney test, U = 125, P = 0.9260). (D) Average freezing during exposure to the tone cue did not differ between groups (unpaired t-test, t(30) = 0.9872, P = 0.3314). (E) Average freezing during intertrial intervals (ITIs) did not differ between groups (unpaired t-test, t(30) = 0.5957, P = 0.5559). Bars are plotted as mean ± SEM. (*) P < 0.05.

This Article

  1. Learn. Mem. 33: