Activity in prelimbic cortex subserves fear memory reconsolidation over time

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

(A) Disruptive effect of temporary prelimbic (PL) cortex inactivation induced by muscimol (MUS) on fear memory reconsolidation. After a familiarization (Fam.) session, animals had Context A paired with foot shocks, the unconditioned stimulus (US). On the next day, they were reexposed to Context A to retrieve/reactivate the established memory, and then received bilaterally into the PL cortex MUS (4.0 nmol in 0.2 µL per side) or vehicle (VEH). Relative to controls, MUS-treated animals froze less when reexposed to the paired context 1 d later (Test A). No differences between groups were seen in an unpaired context (Test B). (B) Fear memory reactivation was necessary for reconsolidation blockade induced by PL-cortex inactivation to occur. On the day following the contextual conditioning session described above, the animals were infused with MUS or VEH after being exposed to Context B (unpaired context) for 3 min. No differences were found when they were reexposed to the paired Context 24 h later (Test A). (C) Bilateral infusion of MUS (4.0 nmol in 0.2 µL per side) into the infralimbic (IL) cortex after memory retrieval/reactivation did not change freezing time relative to the respective controls during both Tests A and B. Gray arrowheads indicate the moment of drug treatment. Bars represent the percentage of total time spent freezing. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. (*) Significant difference (P < 0.05) compared with the respective controls (repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls test).

This Article

  1. Learn. Mem. 21: 14-20